Philosopher's Digest » Clayton Littlejohn http://www.philosophersdigest.com Timely Reviews of Current Philosophy Articles Sun, 29 Aug 2010 16:07:59 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2 en hourly 1 “Warrant and Action” Mikkel Gerken http://www.philosophersdigest.com/synthese/warrant-and-action-mikkel-gerken-2 http://www.philosophersdigest.com/synthese/warrant-and-action-mikkel-gerken-2#comments Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:00:12 +0000 Clayton Littlejohn http://www.philosophersdigest.com/?p=834 Main authors discussed: Keith DeRose, John Hawthorne, Jason Stanley, and Timothy Williamson

Hawthorne and Stanley (2008) defend the Knowledge-Action Principle:

(KA) It is proper to treat p as a reason for action (for some p-dependent choice) iff you know p.

Mikkel Gerken defends the…

]]> http://www.philosophersdigest.com/synthese/warrant-and-action-mikkel-gerken-2/feed 0 “Fallibilism, Epistemic Possibility, and Concessive Knowledge Attributions” Trent Dougherty and Patrick Rysiew http://www.philosophersdigest.com/philphen/fallibilism-epistemic-possibility-and-concessive-knowledge-attributions-trent-dougherty-and-patrick-rysiew http://www.philosophersdigest.com/philphen/fallibilism-epistemic-possibility-and-concessive-knowledge-attributions-trent-dougherty-and-patrick-rysiew#comments Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:29:10 +0000 Clayton Littlejohn http://www.philosophersdigest.com/?p=319 Main authors discussed: David Lewis and Jason Stanley

The fallibilist claims that it’s possible to know p even if your evidence for believing p does not entail p.  It seems that infallibilism entails scepticism because it seems that we don’t have…

]]> http://www.philosophersdigest.com/philphen/fallibilism-epistemic-possibility-and-concessive-knowledge-attributions-trent-dougherty-and-patrick-rysiew/feed 7