<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Philosopher's Digest &#187; act and potency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.philosophersdigest.com/tag/act-and-potency/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.philosophersdigest.com</link>
	<description>Timely Reviews of Current Philosophy Articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 16:07:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>“The Non-identity of the Categorical and the Dispositional” David S. Oderberg</title>
		<link>http://www.philosophersdigest.com/analysis/%e2%80%9cthe-non-identity-of-the-categorical-and-the-dispositional%e2%80%9d-david-s-oderberg</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosophersdigest.com/analysis/%e2%80%9cthe-non-identity-of-the-categorical-and-the-dispositional%e2%80%9d-david-s-oderberg#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Edward Feser</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[act and potency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Categorical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispositional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[essentialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metaphysics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philosophersdigest.com/?p=768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Analysis, Volume 69, Number 4 (October 2009), pages 677-684.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><em>Main authors discussed</em>: David Oderberg, Galen Strawson, Alexander Bird, Mark Heller</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Oderberg’s article is a response to Galen Strawson’s “The identity of the categorical and the dispositional” (reviewed previously). Strawson, following Descartes, assumes&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosophersdigest.com/analysis/%e2%80%9cthe-non-identity-of-the-categorical-and-the-dispositional%e2%80%9d-david-s-oderberg/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
